Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA05966 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 10 Feb 2001 21:19:27 GMT Message-ID: <004e01c093ab$e9625440$8c06bed4@default> From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> References: <20010209021934.AAA25769%camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.66]> <3A837162.ABBF86AB@pacbell.net> <3A83774A.12635390@wehi.edu.au> Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 22:52:46 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Sir,
I have tried to access the pages mentioned here below, but could not.
So, in order to retrieve additional info about the subject I call upon your
offer. Please send me a draft of your paper, as in a simple E- mail post.
Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be
Thanks,
Kenneth
( I am, because we are) deep in Lamarckism
> >
> In an essay that is coming out in a book published this month, I
> distinguish 3 kinds of Lamarckism: Type 1 (soft inheritance), Type 2
> (intentional and directed variation) and Type 3 (progressive evolution).
> I can send a PDF of a penultimate draft to anyone who is interested, and
> excerpts of it were posted in the talk.origins newsgroup <
http://x56.deja.com/[ST_rn=ps]/getdoc.xp?AN=651195767>
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 10 2001 - 21:21:30 GMT