RE: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Feb 09 2001 - 17:31:08 GMT

  • Next message: Chris Taylor: "Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA01486 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 9 Feb 2001 17:31:56 GMT
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745C52@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
    Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 17:31:08 -0000 
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >> most memetic mutations must occur not within a mind but between
    minds

            <I'm not so sure - where do most 'new' ideas come from? I'd say
    those
    > that arise as a result of miscopying between actors are a minority (but
    > I wouldn't like to put a figure on it); it seems to me that the majority
    > of novel memes come from the interactions between resident memes in a
    > mind (or in a group 'think tank' style, 'bouncing' ideas around [a
    > metamind?]). Although the overwhelming bulk of these come originally
    > from outside, the change seems (to me) to occur within a mind rather
    > than in transfer. After all we have the old thing about whether two
    > people can ever have the 'same' meme, because if you break it down they
    > will have used different resident info to model the idea which is being
    > transferred.>
    >
            Well, there are clear examples of behaviours emerging out of highly
    suspect interpretations of external recorded information, such as the snake
    handling christian sects that base their practices on what is, to any sane
    person, a woeful misreading of the last few verses of Mark's gospel- verses
    which historians aren't convinced even belong there anyway (since the two
    earliest known manuscripts of this gospel don't include these verses- check
    your bible to see if it mentions this, many editions do). Of course they
    think they're doing god's bidding as laid down in the divine word of the
    bible, but that doesn't mean they've accurately inferred what Mark was
    trying to get across. (that's Mark the disciple, and not Mark Mills of this
    list :-)).

            I can't comment on your question.

            Vincent

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 09 2001 - 17:34:00 GMT