RE: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Feb 08 2001 - 10:37:06 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Question"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id KAA25005 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:37:58 GMT
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745C4B@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
    Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:37:06 -0000 
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

            <Your view that sociopolitical institutions suppres our freedom does

    > not address the contention that it is cognitively and somatically
    > present to be suppressed. If it did not exist in the first place, the
    > governmental form would not matter at all, since no form of
    > government can suppress a nonexistent freedom.>
    >
    >
            Well, I'm not sure that's what Robin was saying when he was talking
    about the limitations of free will 'in some senses'. I'd agree there is
    something there cognitively and somatically, as you put it, that corresponds
    to free will, so there's no argument there.

            My contention was merely that we are not equally free to make some
    kinds of social decisions as others, and often people use the concept of
    free will not in the cognitive sense, but in the socio-political sense.
    I've (finally) got to Cavalli-Sforza's chapter on cultural transmission in
    his most recent book, and one aspect that he talks about is the high
    correlation between parents and children in terms of both religious beliefs
    and political beliefs. Whilst the former is often described by people as
    innate ('I was born X'), the latter is one of those things that people most
    often ascribe to free will- it's "their" opinion, "their" point of view,
    reached at by though and deliberation- only in lots of ways it isn't. One
    could also look at the work of Bourdieu in relation to things like aesthetic
    tastes, which he argues is closely related to factors like family,
    geography, education, class etc. (actually if I remember correctly he argued
    such things determine tastes, but I'm not sure I'd go that far, and for the
    life of me I can't remember his term for this).

            So, yes we have free will, but we don't use it nearly as much as we
    think we do.

            Vincent

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 08 2001 - 10:40:01 GMT