RE: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Feb 06 2001 - 12:41:51 GMT

  • Next message: Dr Able Lawrence: "RE: Evolution of ontogeny"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA13667 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 6 Feb 2001 12:42:44 GMT
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745C3C@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
    Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 12:41:51 -0000 
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >> Yep, which is why culture can be seen as an evolutionary
    process,
    >> conscious and deliberate choice needn't be a factor.

            <Actually, it's not an all-or-nothing thing. Some memes are adopted

    > intentionally (such as computer literacy, in my case) and some are
    > adopted inadvertantly (such as an annoying pop tune on eternal
    > loop inside one's head).>
    >
            Exactly. That was my original point.

            Vincent

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 06 2001 - 12:45:26 GMT