Re: Labels for memes

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Wed Jan 31 2001 - 09:55:27 GMT

  • Next message: Tim Rhodes: "Re: Labels for memes"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id KAA19648 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:36:42 GMT
    Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:55:27 +0000
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Labels for memes
    Message-ID: <20010131095527.E10942@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <JJEIIFOCALCJKOFDFAHBOEIJCDAA.richard@brodietech.com> <Pine.WNT.4.21.0101301617130.-571365@Starship083.cbe.wwu.edu>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
    In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.21.0101301617130.-571365@Starship083.cbe.wwu.edu>; from market@cc.wwu.edu on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 04:26:09PM -0800
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 04:26:09PM -0800, TJ Olney wrote:
    > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Richard Brodie wrote:
    >
    > > Robin,
    > > << Where information is transmitted, that information is _not_
    > > normally seen as existing only at each end of the transmission chain.
    > > In fact, to do so is incoherent. No matter how complex its encoding, it
    > > exists throughout the chain (at some point in time). It _has_ to do so,
    > > in order to make it from one end to the other.>>
    > >
    > > The information has to exist, but not the meme. The meme stays right in the
    > > head of the ad exec for Budweiser. He pays someone to do a TV commercial, it
    > > gets broadcast, information gets transmitted, and suddenly a million new
    > > copies of the "Wazzuuuuup?" meme get created in new minds.
    >
    > OK, I'm with you here, but why is not the encoded message a meme? I'm
    > getting a picture of trancription RNA as opposed to DNA. The original
    > meme gets encoded into the commercial. The commercial gets encoded into a
    > stream of data. The stream of data gets decoded using a matching reverse
    > process into the commercial again. The viewer watches the commercial.
    > To the extent that the viewer has the memetic configuration that 1)
    > enables "getting" the meme (decoding as intended) and 2) does not to
    > reject the meme, then the meme has replicated in the viewers mind.
    >
    > Is that the story? Or am I off?

    That's the story. You're on. The encoded message is a meme(plex).

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    robin@reborntechnology.co.uk
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 31 2001 - 10:45:18 GMT