Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA17771 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:27:59 GMT From: <joedees@bellsouth.net> To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:31:24 -0600 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: Mirror neurons Message-ID: <3A76D03C.4620.523950@localhost> In-reply-to: <3A771B73.3E957914@pacbell.net> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On 30 Jan 2001, at 11:52, Bill Spight wrote:
> Dear Mark,
> 
> Thanks for the additional information. :-)
> 
> > So, it looks like these experiments have been entirely with
> > primates.
> > 
> 
> And with looking. What about listening? If mirror neurons are a good
> category, maybe they are used in listening, as well. 
> 
> Have they distinguished neurons that fire when we observe someone
> doing what we can also do (and are involved in our doing that) from
> neurons that fire when we think about doing that but are not observing
> the behavior? 
> 
> Many thanks,
> 
They're in the vicinity of Broca's area, responsible for the 
transmutation of meant words into speech, a basically transcriptive 
executing property.  I would at first thought have expected such 
neurons to be closer to Wernicke's area, which is responsible for 
semantic processing.  A person with damage to Broca's area 
speaks slowly and haltingly, but makes sense, while a person with 
damage may be loquacious, but meaninglessly so (a person 
suffering damage to the arcuate fasciculus, which connects these 
two, suffers global aphasia).  However, on second thought, there is 
the likelihood that we subliminally mimic the movements of others 
as we do with speech or text (our tongues and palates silently and 
slightly move as we hear or read language).  Of course we KNOW 
what they're doing, but we also, sublminally, are DOING what 
they're doing; thus these neurons would fire the same as they 
would if we were overtly doing the same things we are observing.  
Imitation is a powerful force in humans - a good argument for 
conserving the meanings found in the spelling MIMEtics.
>
> Bill
> 
> ===============================================================
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
> 
> 
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 30 2001 - 20:29:52 GMT