Re: Mirror neurons

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Tue Jan 30 2001 - 20:31:24 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Labels for memes"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA17771 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:27:59 GMT
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:31:24 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Mirror neurons
    Message-ID: <3A76D03C.4620.523950@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <3A771B73.3E957914@pacbell.net>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 30 Jan 2001, at 11:52, Bill Spight wrote:

    > Dear Mark,
    >
    > Thanks for the additional information. :-)
    >
    > > So, it looks like these experiments have been entirely with
    > > primates.
    > >
    >
    > And with looking. What about listening? If mirror neurons are a good
    > category, maybe they are used in listening, as well.
    >
    > Have they distinguished neurons that fire when we observe someone
    > doing what we can also do (and are involved in our doing that) from
    > neurons that fire when we think about doing that but are not observing
    > the behavior?
    >
    > Many thanks,
    >
    They're in the vicinity of Broca's area, responsible for the
    transmutation of meant words into speech, a basically transcriptive
    executing property. I would at first thought have expected such
    neurons to be closer to Wernicke's area, which is responsible for
    semantic processing. A person with damage to Broca's area
    speaks slowly and haltingly, but makes sense, while a person with
    damage may be loquacious, but meaninglessly so (a person
    suffering damage to the arcuate fasciculus, which connects these
    two, suffers global aphasia). However, on second thought, there is
    the likelihood that we subliminally mimic the movements of others
    as we do with speech or text (our tongues and palates silently and
    slightly move as we hear or read language). Of course we KNOW
    what they're doing, but we also, sublminally, are DOING what
    they're doing; thus these neurons would fire the same as they
    would if we were overtly doing the same things we are observing.
    Imitation is a powerful force in humans - a good argument for
    conserving the meanings found in the spelling MIMEtics.
    >
    > Bill
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 30 2001 - 20:29:52 GMT