Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA01209 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 25 Jan 2001 16:05:19 GMT From: <SNJASA@aol.com> Message-ID: <f8.6e3a70c.27a1a7e2@aol.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 11:01:38 EST Subject: Re: this list & gene/meme To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Unknown sub 104 Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
I've no formal background in memetics but have followed these discussions 
with great interest for some time.  What Chris said here precipitated a sort 
of Zen koan breakthrough for me in thinking about thinking about thinking 
about...things.  What I can't quite make out is whether what I'm experiencing 
is a sort of infinite regress, eternal recurrence, or something else 
altogether.  If I have whirled off the end of the map here, please disregard.
All Best,
Betty
In a message dated 01/24/2001 11:49:53 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
ddiamond@ozemail.com.au writes:
<< I think these 'discussions' between myself and, in particular,=
  Joe, Aaron, and Vincent, show a fundamental distinction at work=
  namely that of SAMENESS vs DIFFERENCE.
 
 SAMENESS thinking is like-mindedness thinking where a shared=
  context (i.e. same language, education level, social elements,=
  ontologies etc) acts as a source of security. This context will=
  force the emergence of paranoia etc when you introduce=
  DIFFERENCE into to it.
 
 Vincent has commented on my criticism of all disciplines as=
  manifesting a degree of 'madness' and his comments reflect the=
  reaction to DIFFERENCE.
 
 My approach does not criticise disciplines other than the=
  assertion that they express 'facts' when they are more localised=
  metaphors used to describe object (WHAT)/relationships(WHERE)=
  patterns. In that context their 'truths' are always qualified.=
  (When taken literally this is not the case, the 'truths' are=
  expressed as if 'real'.)
 
 In the context of genetics/memetics, there is a general feeling=
  applied to this dichotomy where the 'gene' is more 'solid', more=
  'object', something tangable, whereas 'meme' is more=
  'relationships' in that it is intangable, composed of 'wind'=
  such that memes can share the same space, unlike genes (to some=
  degree; code sharing is possible)
 
 Thus a meme can consist of other memes in that the intangable=
  characteristics allow for many memes to share the same space.=
  This characteristic is a property of relational space where, for=
  example, complex emotional expressions (memes?) can be made-up=
  of blending more basic emotional expressions; you get into the=
  concept of superpositions and wave forms.
 
 I have emphasised before re memes, to get through ANY wall, real=
  or imagined, you need to use waves and it is memes that do this=
  in that they get through our object oriented filtering systems=
  (emphasis on the PARTICULAR, EXPLICIT). Thus a meme is expressed=
  as that irritating 'jingle' in your head that has soaked-in over=
  a few days of exposure.
 
 Now think of this in the form of 'murky' arguement. A GENERAL but=
  murky arguement can work the same way as a 'jingle' in that=
  pockets of LOCAL data seep into the perceiver's mind over time=
  -- like the emergence of a wave pattern from firing electrons at=
  two slits in a wall. The emerging wave pattern reflects a hidden=
  element where all of the 'independent' electrons suddenely seem=
  'linked together'.
 
 This process reflects insight, intuition etc and is a=
  characteristic of object/relationship thinking to a degree where=
  you can structure arguements in this way. What happens is that=
  the frustration caused acts to intensify the association making,=
  the drive to identify clearly "what could that be?". Eventually=
  this can lead to the 'Ah-HA!' experience, an experience long=
  remembered than learning from spoon-feeding.
 
 best,
 
 Chris.
 
 
  >>
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 25 2001 - 16:07:13 GMT