Re: this list

From: Aaron Agassi (agassi@erols.com)
Date: Wed Jan 24 2001 - 17:55:19 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: this list"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA26509 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 24 Jan 2001 18:01:19 GMT
    Message-ID: <00d901c0862e$d0b033c0$5eaefea9@cable.rcn.com>
    From: "Aaron Agassi" <agassi@erols.com>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <203F0199CBACD211BCC100508B91BC471056C9@CSGSERVER> <00ce01c08628$f828a140$5eaefea9@cable.rcn.com> <3A6F0FEB.1F0EC30F@bioinf.man.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re: this list
    Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:55:19 -0500
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Chris Taylor" <Christopher.Taylor@man.ac.uk>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 12:24 PM
    Subject: Re: this list

    > > Chris Lofting that just taxes us and wastes our time and effort.
    >
    > Just stop replying - delete the messages from your inbox, or even better
    set up a
    > filter on your inbox!

    I might be more comfortable simply inviting Chris Lofting into a
    meta-discussion, a discussion about the discussion, where in we will broach
    the question of the terms of further discourse, and to identify our
    procedural disagreements.

    If Chris Lofting refuses to respond or participate in any discourse on
    points of order, then I would feel justified in making an ultimatum as
    applicable to future exchanges with me. And I invite comment.on the
    following first draft of definition my own terms and expectations for
    discourse:

    1) Clarifications upon request.

    2) An effort at writing well and clearly. Not just a burden upon the reader!

    3) A direct and combative sportsmanlike approach, where argument is met
    either by counter argument, or even some concession when if the burden of
    the counter argument cannot be met. In short, just open honesty, continuity
    and coherence.

    >Then perhaps we can get off semiotics and on to some proper
    > biology.
    >
    > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    > Chris Taylor (chris@bioinf.man.ac.uk)
    > http://bioinf.man.ac.uk/ »people»chris
    > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 24 2001 - 18:03:09 GMT