Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id JAA24373 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 24 Jan 2001 09:24:20 GMT From: "Chris Lofting" <ddiamond@ozemail.com.au> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: ....and the beat goes on and on and on... Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 20:32:25 +1100 Message-ID: <LPBBICPHCJJBPJGHGMCICEBPCNAA.ddiamond@ozemail.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745BFC@inchna.stir.ac.uk> X-RBL-Warning: (orbs.dorkslayers.com) Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
> Of Vincent Campbell
> Sent: Wednesday, 24 January 2001 2:59
> To: 'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'
> Subject: RE: ....and the beat goes on and on and on...
>
>
> <or (a THIRD) you cannot understand what I am saying. Thats ok
> Vincent. dont
> > worry about it. :-)>
> >
> The more one reads your responses the more pissed off one gets.
> Your utterly misplaced smugness demonstrates only your own
> stupidity. I ask
> again, name a single semiotician who has expressed on record concurrence
> with your (mis)understanding and interpretation of the field.
>
hmmm... try the ***** list archives for 95/96, they are all semiotics
biased, list is more into Peirce in particular. Some 'saw' what was
developing, others still live in the 19th century, you and Joe would like
them :-)
<snip rubbish>
> I am already aware of the major basic flaws that any person of any
> intellect whatsoever (that excludes you, of course) would see if they had
> the misfortune to come across your ideas. I have asked you about
> a million
> times for a single piece of original evidence to support your theory, and
> all you do is throw that back through more reiteration of your
> ideas. It is
> you who are lite- on every count of what makes a theory plausible.
>
I have presented refs repeatedly on this list over a long time; obviously
you have found it all to difficult to deal with. Even now, as you 'rave-on'
Derick asks reasonable questions and I have supplied him with reference
material and have offered more if he wants it.
I keep supplying links etc to data that supports me but do you read it, do
you think about it -- No, it is all to hard for you since it means you have
to work and you dont want to. OK, Dont but that does not give you the right
to come up with the crap you have lately.
Chris.
------------------
Chris Lofting
websites:
http://www.eisa.net.au/~lofting
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~ddiamond
List Owner: http://www.egroups.com/group/semiosis
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 24 2001 - 09:26:09 GMT