RE: DNA Culture .... Trivia?

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Jan 22 2001 - 14:10:09 GMT

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "RE: DNA Culture .... Trivia?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA16070 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 22 Jan 2001 14:11:23 GMT
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745BF6@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: DNA Culture .... Trivia?
    Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 14:10:09 -0000
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Thanks Bill,

    Didn't someone recently post a list of sites/references to studies of e-mail
    communication?

    I have been saving all the posts since I joined the list (2144 since
    27/4/00- not including my own posts, which I keep in my sent items folder,
    and probably add a few hundred since I'm such a mouthy git!), and have
    considered doing that kind of analysis.

    There's certainly enough there.

    Vincent

    > ----------
    > From: William Benzon
    > Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 1:59 pm
    > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Subject: Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?
    >
    > on 1/22/01 7:27 AM, Vincent Campbell at v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk wrote:
    >
    > > Do you notice how, there can be weeks of very little activity on the
    > list,
    > > but when people start getting a bit agitated, it suddenly explodes into
    > life
    > > (albeit very red and tooth and claw)?
    >
    > Well, if someone wants to undertake a little research project, they could
    > count up all the messages in the archive and plot the number of messages
    > against time (say, the number of messages per day) and analyze that
    > distribution.
    >
    > There's been a bit of research that analyzes internet traffic flow at the
    > packet level. This research shows that it has a fractal distribution. I
    > wonder if we'd get that kind of result at the message level for this list.
    >
    > >
    > > I have mixed feelings about it. I enjoy a heated debate, but I also
    > think
    > > its brings the worst out in us, especially on a faceless e-mail list,
    > where
    > > people talk to each other in ways they never would face to face (and
    > I've
    > > been as guilty of this as anyone else).
    >
    > A psychologist named Norman Holland has written an article on what he
    > calls
    > the internet regression, what happens in email communication. I'm sure if
    > you do a web search on his name, or on "internet regression" you'll come
    > up
    > with the article sooner or later.
    >
    > Bill b
    >
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 22 2001 - 14:13:08 GMT