Re: ....and the beat goes on and on and on...

From: Aaron Agassi (agassi@erols.com)
Date: Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:21:40 GMT

  • Next message: Gatherer, D. (Derek): "RE: ....and the beat goes on and on and on..."

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA15656 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 22 Jan 2001 13:28:11 GMT
    Message-ID: <03b501c08476$41726fc0$5eaefea9@cable.rcn.com>
    From: "Aaron Agassi" <agassi@erols.com>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745BEE@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re: ....and the beat goes on and on and on...
    Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 08:21:40 -0500
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Vincent Campbell" <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 7:11 AM
    Subject: RE: ....and the beat goes on and on and on...

    > This list has suddenly taken a turn for personal invective, but I'm not
    > going to let that put me off.
    >
    > Your use of other references has been challenged on many occasions because
    > of your idiolectic use of them to support your own theory, for which you
    > provide not a single piece of original, empirical evidence. You
    > deliberately misunderstand entire disciplines are try and wrench them into
    > your model.
    >
    > All you have is specious argument, and a deliberate persistent ability to
    > completely ignore perfectly straight-forward questions or points that
    others
    > make that, at the very least, create problems for your claims, and more
    > usually reveal your theory's paucity.

    Leave us not forget, that Chris Lofting guilty of far, far worse, even then
    that.

    When asked simply for clarification or confirmation of the meaning of his
    linguistically impenetrable screed, line by line, even then he refuses to
    respond.

    >
    > You've done it again here, and the fact that you've got nasty only
    > demonstrates you intellectual inadequacy. I would have thought someone
    > convinced they'd found the answer to life the universe and everything,
    would
    > have a bit more patience and civility, but then one can't expect that much
    > from a colonial....
    >
    > Vincent
    >
    <snip>

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:29:54 GMT