Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA15513 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 22 Jan 2001 13:08:36 GMT Message-Id: <200101221306.IAA00777@mail5.lig.bellsouth.net> From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net> To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 07:08:23 -0600 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: RE: ....and the beat goes on and on and on... In-reply-to: <LPBBICPHCJJBPJGHGMCIKEAHCNAA.ddiamond@ozemail.com.au> References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745BEE@inchna.stir.ac.uk> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01b) Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
From: "Chris Lofting" <ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: ....and the beat goes on and on and on...
Date sent: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 00:02:09 +1100
Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> Your sweeping statements lack foundation Vincent, you are doing what you
> accuse me of doing. tsk tsk -- very weak. Where have my use of references
> been challenged, which *SPECIFIC* one is which *specific* context? the only
> so called challenges have been from Mr "I have a broom up my arse" Dees and
> he is 'lost' :-)
>
> As for you .. well you know about you so I will let you wallow... you
> chickened out like Dees does when things get 'difficult'. There is no
> engagement in your note, you copped out of reading references and asking
> intelligent questions, all too hard for you perhaps?
>
> BTW the remark about being a colonial - LOL!!! shows you defences at work,
> shows a lack of class as well ... what are you ...LSE? :-)
>
> So Vincent, are you going to get off your arse and ask valid questions?
> doubt it .. not capable..
> or too scared...
>
Chris, YOU are the one who adds terms to triadic systems to
create four so they are divisible by two, and then fail to add terms
by the same methodology to dyadic systems, a cynical and
hypocritical double standard that reveals both you and the
nonposition for which you interminably shill as inconsistent and
intellectually bankrupt. The idea of you being able to
unequivocably and reasonably answer a question is laughable, as
your hebephrenic list screeds more than amply display. I was
correct when I branded you as an unthinking zombic memebot of
the lowest order, in cognitive thrall to pernicious error. Your many
logical errors have manifestly been pointed out, by me and by
others, on this list; it is you who are slowly twisting in the wind;
you are quite simply too dense and obtuse, or too self-serving, or
both, to recognize this fact.
>
> 'warmest' regards,
>
> Chris.
> ------------------
> Chris Lofting
> websites:
> http://www.eisa.net.au/~lofting
> http://www.ozemail.com.au/~ddiamond
> List Owner: http://www.egroups.com/group/semiosis
>
>
> ===============================================================
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
>
>
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:10:18 GMT