Re: phenotypic plasticity and ontogeny

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Sun Jan 21 2001 - 03:26:32 GMT

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: phenotypic plasticity and ontogeny"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id DAA11094 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 21 Jan 2001 03:29:23 GMT
    Subject: Re: phenotypic plasticity and ontogeny
    Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 22:26:32 -0500
    x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <20010121032450.AAA7465@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.163]>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Hi Joe E. Dees --

    >> Does that sound enough like memetic sex for you?
    >>
    >The propagators or distributors (disSEMINators) of memes could
    >be viewed to be the 'male' side, and those prospective candidate
    >recipients who select, for whatever reason, to accept or reject them
    >could be viewed as the 'female' side.

    Any reason for the femaleness in reference to memes, uh, at all? Not that
    I dislike taking sides, I'm usually for the underdog in all contests,
    and, not to undermine the dichotomous level of the whole yin/yang thing,
    but, I'm more and more not seeing any reason to give anything but 'male'
    properties to memes, which I also now see as not being needed _at all_ on
    the receiving end. The memetic action is the insertion of the unit of
    self, and the meme (-plex) is the special cultural meaning given to the
    unit by the behavior. That the unit projected by the meme is
    taken/received/birthed at all is a function not of a memetic co-process,
    but of self-burdened human nature as it is and as it is environed.

    Otherwise, those kinds of people who are born every minute wouldn't be
    noticeable (and buying homeopathic nostrums, or accepting or rejecting
    flowers....)

    And Mark's example was nice, but, almost too literal, yes? I see the
    analogy as much more general. Memetic sex is all around us, even here,
    right now, in the way I phrase this email.

    It is the true cybersex....

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 21 2001 - 03:31:03 GMT