Re: phenotypic plasticity and ontogeny

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Jan 20 2001 - 23:41:06 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: phenotypic plasticity and ontogeny"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA10786 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 20 Jan 2001 23:43:58 GMT
    X-Originating-IP: [209.240.220.191]
    From: "Scott Chase" <ecphoric@hotmail.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: phenotypic plasticity and ontogeny
    Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 18:41:06 -0500
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
    Message-ID: <F179cM3oryKFRJrzdDW00005014@hotmail.com>
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jan 2001 23:41:06.0400 (UTC) FILETIME=[75331E00:01C0833A]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    >Subject: Re: phenotypic plasticity and ontogeny
    >Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 00:00:47 -0500
    >
    >Hi Mark Mills --
    >
    >Thanks for all of that. Highly interesting.
    >
    > >I don't think there is genetic versus memetic sex.
    >
    >Hmmm. I don't think I was looking for a versus- more a 'how can they be
    >the same?' For me to get a gene distributed (replicated), I have to
    >produce progeny, since I ain't just talking about the continuation of my
    >single bodily life or the splitting of my cells, although, yes, in some
    >ways the technology of genetics may one day provide me with another
    >avenue. (For the sake of this definition, a sperm bank is 'sex', but
    >gene-splicing is not.) For me to get a meme distributed, I have to
    >convince someone else to 'birth' it. I have to have 'sex' with them to
    >plant the meme, and hope that the progeny will be recognizable as part of
    >my me(me). So, I'm more and more seeing the meme as a special functional
    >unit of behavior- a tool of the neural system that develops from the
    >phenotypic plastic. And I see it as a 'sexual' element (and, so far, only
    >as the 'male' element) of communication.
    >
    >So, is it only my dirty mind?
    >
    >
    The part about "birthing" an idea reminds of "midwifery" or the "maieutic
    method". I'm not into playdough, so my familiarity with Socrates is not so
    good. I stumbled upon maiuesis in Nietzsche's _Birth of Tragedy_ if I'm not
    mistaken. The midwifery analogy sounds cool at face value (ie- helping
    another cope with labor pains as you coax an idea out of them). The
    fertilization before hand is a little tricky. Maybe it was immaculate
    conception?

    Once born, I wonder if the idea is taken to the nursery with all the other
    newborn ideas.
    _________________________________________________________________
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 20 2001 - 23:45:41 GMT