Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Jan 19 2001 - 20:20:48 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA07114 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 19 Jan 2001 20:23:41 GMT
    X-Originating-IP: [209.240.220.167]
    From: "Scott Chase" <ecphoric@hotmail.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?
    Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:20:48 -0500
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
    Message-ID: <F84dHqn5u3TS0wXbY8U00003cad@hotmail.com>
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jan 2001 20:20:49.0146 (UTC) FILETIME=[4FF1EDA0:01C08255]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    >Subject: Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?
    >Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 14:41:33 -0500
    >
    >On 01/19/01 14:31, Scott Chase said this-
    >
    > >>Why are ideas important seeds?
    > >>
    > >Well let's explore the seed analogy. Would these seeds possess
    >adaptations
    > >for aiding dispersal via wind or perhaps little pricklies helping a
    >surface
    > >embedding onto the carrier to be planted in far off environs. Would some
    > >memetic seeds have juicy and tasty coverings which increase their
    >likelihood
    > >of being consumed and dispersed with the resulting dung?
    >
    > >Are there sporophyte and gametophyte stages? Is there meiosis and
    >reduction
    > >division? Crossing over and recombination? Unequal crossing over leading
    >to
    > >meme duplication? Jumping memes?
    >
    >Yes, exactly. Time to identify the real, environmental and adaptive
    >features of these things, as active agents, for direct and directed
    >purposes.
    >
    >Not that I am advocating such fierce analogical precision- quite the
    >contrary, although I applaud your poetic exercise.
    >
    Luckily, I didn't think about a twist on memetic peas in a pod or goobers.
    >
    > >In a viral analogy, all memes would do is co-opt host
    > >machinery to facilitate more copies being made.
    >
    >Which could also be explained without such an agent, quite
    >satisfactorily. Using Occam, there is no need for a viral meme, IMHO.
    >
    >
    I dunno, for some reason the viral sort sounds more reasonable than bringing
    sex and all it entails into the analogy.

    OTOH I guess there's something to be said for the recombination of ideas,
    but let's not get carried away.

    _________________________________________________________________
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 19 2001 - 20:25:22 GMT