Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA03691 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:09:24 GMT From: "Chris Lofting" <ddiamond@ozemail.com.au> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: ....and the beat goes on and on and on... Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 23:17:05 +1100 Message-ID: <LPBBICPHCJJBPJGHGMCIKEOBCMAA.ddiamond@ozemail.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-reply-to: <200101191145.GAA01874@mail1.lig.bellsouth.net> Importance: Normal Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
> Of Joe E. Dees
> Sent: Friday, 19 January 2001 10:25
> To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> Subject: RE: ....and the beat goes on and on and on...
>
>
> From: "Chris Lofting" <ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
> Subject: RE: ....and the beat goes on and on and on...
> Date sent: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 22:18:17 +1100
> Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
>
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
> [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
> > > Of Joe E. Dees
> > > Sent: Friday, 19 January 2001 8:22
> > > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> > > Subject: RE: ....and the beat goes on and on and on...
> > >
> > >
> >
> > > I should know it is impossible to instruct the brainless
> (sigh), but I'll
> > > try again...
> > > WHAT IS NOT deals with what cannot happen in the present.
> > > WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN deals with what might have happened
> > > in the past.
> > > WHAT COULD BE deals with what might still happen in the future.
> > > As the first term, WHAT IS NOT, possesses a negative not found
> > > in WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN and WHAT COULD BE, they do
> > > not correlate as isomorphic expressions in differing time contexts;
> > > WHAT MAY or MIGHT (now) BE IS THEIR LOGICAL
> > > COMPLEMENT.
> > >
> >
> > Oh is *THAT* what you are raving about, symmetry! 1:1 ness!.
> God, Joe took
> > you a while to get that across. Ok I get you now but you are
> sort of 'wrong'
> > :-) In my writing the emphasis of the NOT deals with an
> additional cognitive
> > process, namely the use of identifying something by its
> negation (if you go
> > through my material there is an emphasis on 1:many etc and cognitive
> > processes ..).
> >
> > Hmm..I think the 'problem' in our communications is you try to
> come from a
> > more logical perspective (or assume mine is 'pure' logic)
> whereas in fact I
> > have always come from a cognitive perspective. (and so my emphasis on
> > neurology/senses etc 1:many etc etc etc, you try to work within, I work
> > across).
> >
> I need read no further. Once you have renounced logic, you lose
> the ability to argue for or against anything, since all argument
> proceeds logically. I have long suspected you of knowing how
> illogical and nonsensical you are; I never expected you to actually
> admit same. However, now that you have rendered yourself
> publicly unabledue to lack of logical tools, to distinguish truth from
> falsehood, or to discern either validity or soundness, or the
> absence of either, you are revealed to be absolutely useless to any
> rational pursuits.
Joe, you lack imagination. You are so rigid, so ALL or NOTHING, so literal
minded. so LIMITED. Get some help.
>
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 19 2001 - 12:12:36 GMT