RE: DNA Culture .... Trivia?

From: Joe E. Dees (joedees@bellsouth.net)
Date: Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:52:29 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: DNA Culture .... Trivia?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA19957 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:49:21 GMT
    Message-Id: <200101161246.HAA13115@mail3.lig.bellsouth.net>
    From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 06:52:29 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: RE: DNA Culture .... Trivia?
    In-reply-to: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745BD5@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01b)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: DNA Culture .... Trivia?
    Date sent: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:42:33 -0000
    Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    > >There are at least three camps; the G memers (memes only
    > > BETWEEN minds, in the world), the L memers (memes only
    > > WITHIN minds), and the camp to whicch I belong, the G + L
    > > memers (the life cycle of a meme involves both endocognitive and
    > > exocognitive stages). For members of the third camp, it is as
    > > impossible to understand how a meme could get mutated or
    > > selected between minds as it is to see how it could get replicated
    > > within one, and all of these are required for memes to evolve.>
    > >
    > Just one quick comment here on this point. Memes can get selected
    > between minds if they fool our generally indequate perceptions. So you
    > people watch someone perform a rain dance, it starts to rain, they make the
    > false connection between the dance and it raining. Next time you need rain,
    > you consider trying the dance out yourself. You do it, it doesn't work- and
    > you assume you didn't do the dance right. Lots and lots and lots of people
    > have similar personal habits and superstitions, e.g. sports stars that wear
    > 'lucky' pants/shoes etc. One my mum persists with if that if you drop a
    > knife on the floor, someone else must pick it up- she doesn't know why
    > (other than it's bad luck). But I can see that if you said 'Oh that's
    > stupid!' and cut yourself whilst picking up the knife that false association
    > would persist (similarly with walking under ladders being bad luck).
    >
    Of course memes are not always selected on the basis of valid
    criteria or reasoning - in fact, they frequently are not. The particular
    invalid assumption you point to is known as the post hoc ergo
    propter hoc (after, therefore because of) fallacy.
    >
    > (I think I've mentioned before Blackmore's earlier work on
    > probability misjudgement in this kind of context).
    >
    > This can happen in other ways too, not only through mis-perception,
    > but in relation to our desire to improve (or even just maintain) our
    > position in the social hierarchy. Doesn't Blackmore in her book give the
    > idea that we copy those who are successful, and with that details irrelevant
    > to that person's success may be copied? e.g. a successful hunter who has
    > high social status happens to use red arrowflights, so as well as trying to
    > copy his hunting techniques, people copy other bits, like his red arrows.
    > Further, copying his red arrows, and his dress, maybe be a lot easier, take
    > a lot less effort, and may work as easily to improve the imitator's social
    > status, thus "mutation" may occur.
    >
    His dress is one memetic component, his red arrows another, his
    hunting techniques a third. They may together form a memeplex,
    but the individual memes comprising such a conglomerate may be
    adopted outside of it without having undergone any mutation, just
    separation from a prior context and installation in a new one.
    >
    > IMHO it's an idea that potentially prevents g-memes having no way to
    > spread.
    >
    G-memes are those between minds, and L-memes are the stage
    within minds, so g-memes are spread through any communicative
    behavior, be it showing, telling, or writing. It's still the mind of the
    recipient that decides whether to accept or reject a presented
    meme. This may happen intentionally or inadvertently, but any
    meme that only exists in one mind and can never successfully
    pass between minds will never find a causal way to exist in two.
    >
    > Vincent
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 16 2001 - 12:50:56 GMT