Re: phonosemantics

From: Mark Mills (mmills@htcomp.net)
Date: Mon Jan 15 2001 - 20:05:09 GMT

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "DNA Culture....trivia ?/ To Robert Grimes"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA18010 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 15 Jan 2001 20:09:40 GMT
    Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20010115140255.0213eec0@pop3.htcomp.net>
    X-Sender: mmills@pop3.htcomp.net
    X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
    Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:05:09 -0600
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: Mark Mills <mmills@htcomp.net>
    Subject: Re: phonosemantics
    In-Reply-To: <50.100fd116.279481bb@aol.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Jess,

    A couple of broad questions.

    How important is non-arbitrary phonosemantics is the scheme of things?

    Is there any neural models supporting non-arbitrary phonosemantics?

    Mark

    http://www.htcomp.net/markmills

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 15 2001 - 20:11:14 GMT