Sound symbolism and language

From: Zylogy@aol.com
Date: Sun Jan 14 2001 - 00:27:50 GMT

  • Next message: Lawrence de Bivort: "Re: Sound symbolism and language"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA12387 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 14 Jan 2001 00:30:55 GMT
    From: <Zylogy@aol.com>
    Message-ID: <a5.10222174.27924c86@aol.com>
    Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 19:27:50 EST
    Subject: Sound symbolism and language
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    CC: Zylogy@aol.com
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 129
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Hi, all. Being new to the list I'll briefly introduce myself and see if
    there's any interest in the topic I focus on. You can call me Jess (a kinder,
    gentler from of address (now that the Bush dynasty is back in office)). I
    study phonosemantics in natural language and in animal communication. Did a
    stint in the linguistics doctoral program at UCBerkeley a while back until we
    had a mutual parting of the ways. I still attend linguistic functions and
    give the occasional talk (including an upcoming trip to Atlanta, Georgia to
    talk with the bonobo researchers there). Co-founded the Linguistic Iconism
    Association a couple of years ago, which now boasts over 200 language
    professionals in its member roster
    (http://www.conknet.com/~mmagnus/LIA/index.html). We also have a discussion
    list (not nearly as solidly packed as this one- could use some input from
    outside, folks).

    Motivation of linguistic signals is my bread and butter. Having spent nearly
    20 years piecing out the patterns and particulars of phonosemantics, I'm now
    in a position to bring a relatively well-developed theory out. I just know
    many of you out there in the memetics world aren't happy with notions of
    arbitrariness being essential to language- even though that's been part of
    the received wisdom of linguistics for almost a century. In any case there is
    now enough evidence available not to only refute the arbitrariness doctrine
    in its most virulent form, but also to show the way real obfuscation of
    original motivation develops historically.

    I won't go on and on here- want to pick up some issue takers first. Start
    your engines.

    Jess Tauber
    zylogy@aol.com

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 14 2001 - 00:32:26 GMT