Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id DAA15425 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 20 Dec 2000 03:57:48 GMT Message-Id: <200012200355.WAA16421@mail5.lig.bellsouth.net> From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net> To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:00:26 -0600 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: Self-defense In-reply-to: <80.47e47d7.2771577f@aol.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01b) Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
From:           	<LJayson@aol.com>
Date sent:      	Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:29:51 EST
Subject:        	Re: Self-defense
To:             	memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Send reply to:  	memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> In a message dated 12/12/00 7:28:04 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
> wade_smith@harvard.edu writes:
> 
> 
> > Subj: Re: Self-defense
> > Date: 12/12/00 7:28:04 AM Pacific Standard Time
> > From:    wade_smith@harvard.edu (Wade T.Smith)
> > Sender:    fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
> > Reply-to:    memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> > To:    memetics@mmu.ac.uk (memetics list)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On 12/12/00 05:45, Robin Faichney said this-
> > 
> > >All those I've found willing to defend the self
> > >make it very obvious, in their emotional tone, that they feel they're
> > >defending themselves.
> > 
> > I'm quite willing to defend the idea of the self without getting 
> > personally involved, in the same way I'm willing to defend the idea of 
> > evolution without getting pissed off that dogs and I have a lot in 
> > common....
> > 
> > The self is the way we've happened, that's all.
> > 
> > To me, the personal investment is more on the side of those who defend 
> > the 'not-self'. They are the ones who want to disinvest the human of his 
> > origins and command him to some divine distinction.
> > 
> > 
> 
> Hi Wade,
> 
> Your one sentence says it all: 
> 
> "The self is the way we've happened, that's all."
> 
> What is this notion about self-defense?  
> 
Some people are just emotionally attached to non-attachment, and 
their self-esteem is bound together with the doctrine of no-self.
>
> Len Jayson
> 
> 
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Dec 20 2000 - 03:59:17 GMT