Re: Self-defense

From: Joe E. Dees (joedees@bellsouth.net)
Date: Wed Dec 20 2000 - 04:00:26 GMT

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "A 6000 level uni course in memetics"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id DAA15425 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 20 Dec 2000 03:57:48 GMT
    Message-Id: <200012200355.WAA16421@mail5.lig.bellsouth.net>
    From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:00:26 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Self-defense
    In-reply-to: <80.47e47d7.2771577f@aol.com>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01b)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    From: <LJayson@aol.com>
    Date sent: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 19:29:51 EST
    Subject: Re: Self-defense
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    > In a message dated 12/12/00 7:28:04 AM Pacific Standard Time,
    > wade_smith@harvard.edu writes:
    >
    >
    > > Subj: Re: Self-defense
    > > Date: 12/12/00 7:28:04 AM Pacific Standard Time
    > > From: wade_smith@harvard.edu (Wade T.Smith)
    > > Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    > > Reply-to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk (memetics list)
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > On 12/12/00 05:45, Robin Faichney said this-
    > >
    > > >All those I've found willing to defend the self
    > > >make it very obvious, in their emotional tone, that they feel they're
    > > >defending themselves.
    > >
    > > I'm quite willing to defend the idea of the self without getting
    > > personally involved, in the same way I'm willing to defend the idea of
    > > evolution without getting pissed off that dogs and I have a lot in
    > > common....
    > >
    > > The self is the way we've happened, that's all.
    > >
    > > To me, the personal investment is more on the side of those who defend
    > > the 'not-self'. They are the ones who want to disinvest the human of his
    > > origins and command him to some divine distinction.
    > >
    > >
    >
    > Hi Wade,
    >
    > Your one sentence says it all:
    >
    > "The self is the way we've happened, that's all."
    >
    > What is this notion about self-defense?
    >
    Some people are just emotionally attached to non-attachment, and
    their self-esteem is bound together with the doctrine of no-self.
    >
    > Len Jayson
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Dec 20 2000 - 03:59:17 GMT