Re: Who knew genes could get mean?

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Wed Dec 20 2000 - 02:12:44 GMT

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: Self-defense" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id CAA15250 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 20 Dec 2000 02:15:57 GMT
Subject: Re: Who knew genes could get mean?
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 21:12:44 -0500
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <20001220021105.AAA24981@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.171]>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    Hi misy --

    >Is it possible that "instincts" are in fact primitive memes

    Or that culture is advanced instinct....

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Dec 20 2000 - 02:17:23 GMT