RE: The Unbreachable Barrier

From: Chris Lofting (ddiamond@ozemail.com.au)
Date: Thu Dec 14 2000 - 12:44:53 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Message From Sue Blackmore on her Hair"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA28665 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:39:44 GMT
    From: "Chris Lofting" <ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: The Unbreachable Barrier
    Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 23:44:53 +1100
    Message-ID: <LPBBICPHCJJBPJGHGMCIMEKLCLAA.ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    Importance: Normal
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    In-Reply-To: <001e01c064e5$92089be0$b463b8d0@default>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    > Of Lawrence de Bivort
    > Sent: Wednesday, 13 December 2000 8:18
    > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Subject: Re: The Unbreachable Barrier
    >
    >
    > Chris, are these distinction you are making related to G. Spencer Brown's
    > 'algebra' in any way? (LAWS OF FORM).
    >
    > - Lawrence
    >

    Spencer-Brown's material as well as the extentions done by Kaufmann and
    Varela are good examples of the neurology at work. Their work 'resonates'
    since they capture the oscillations that occur within although from reading
    the texts they did no explicitly know that (although I think Varela had/has
    an intuition about it). Our sensory systems deal with paradox by converting
    BOTH/AND into DYNAMIC EITHER/OR.. but this is not just paradox in that
    reality is GENERALLY BOTH/AND (full of potentials) that are converted to
    LOCAL EITHER/ORs (an actual).

    The A~AA~AA~A sequence, shown in Spencer-Brown as abababa ( I cannot use his
    other symbolism here) is 'the same' as the left hemisphere/right hemisphere
    oscillations in that the right is more ~A when compare to the left that is
    more A. (in general :-))

    There is also a complementary pattern as well as an oppositional one, thus
    the ~A is (a) NOT A and (b) a harmonic of A.

    The work done by Pedigrew at the University of Queensland into bipolar
    disorder shows that the oscillations are irregular to a degree when the sum
    of oscillations over a time period show varying degrees of spent time in one
    hemisphere. He was able to correlate this with depressive episodes (right
    hemi in most) etc.

    This gets into some interesting states, for example, over a determined time
    period I can map out all of the POSSIBLE states given (a) the dichotomy of
    left/right (b) the DIFFERENT behavioural characteristics of left/right (can
    vary but there is a general set) (c) the time periods spent 'in' left or
    right.

    For example, a mental state over 1 second where I 'stay' in the left will be
    different to the same period if I stay in the right. If there is an
    irregular timing over a six second time span then I will be in one of 2^6
    possible states at the end of the 6 seconds. I.e.

    LLRLLR
    or
    LLLRRR
    or
    LRLRLR

    etc etc where the expression LLL means staying in the left for three seconds
    etc.

    From reviewing dichotomisations processes where the same method seems to be
    used at all scales so we see here a mapping of experience applicable to
    seconds as well as years (as in manic-depressive states).

    For refs to reflect on, see the those I supplied Mr Dees about 2 emails
    ago... there is also the concept of Cymatics where sand is put on a surface
    and the surface is made to vibrate. Patterns emerge in the sand due to the
    frequency of the vibration (which by definition is an oscillation and not
    necessarily regular). Extend this concept into the brain where we move from
    2D/3D to 3D/4D. This gets into the concept of resonance of MEANING linked to
    combining our emotion system with the wave metaphor, thus the receiving of
    data is in the form of a vibration that sets-off the emotions, the resulting
    pattern is a 'meaning'.

    Note in all of this that it is the ATTENTION system that focuses thus each
    act of zooming-in on something acts to 'start' a particularisation, this the
    general oscillation is modulated and we get into FM vs AM processing of
    data.

    Memory then encodes the patterns (or a sub set of the 'best' harmonics to
    aid in recall) and that data can be used later as feedback into another
    particularisation.

    best,

    Chris.
    ------------------
    Chris Lofting
    websites:
    http://www.eisa.net.au/~lofting
    http://www.ozemail.com.au/~ddiamond

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Dec 14 2000 - 12:41:10 GMT