Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id JAA06493 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 22 Nov 2000 09:57:36 GMT Message-ID: <A4400389479FD3118C9400508B0FF230041103@DELTA.newhouse.akzonobel.nl> From: "Gatherer, D. (Derek)" <D.Gatherer@organon.nhe.akzonobel.nl> To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: religion/spirituality Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 10:52:55 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Derek:
Surely,
> if the viral model really applies to religions, somewhere
in that vast time
> span the requisite change would have taken place?
>
Matt:
Perhaps that just means that the requisite change was to
Christianity.
Derek:
But that would be more that just a change to prosetylization. What I'm
asking is why there wasn't a religion that was identical to Judaism but
simply added horizontal propagation. If religion is a virus, and if
cultural change really does operate in an analogous way to genetic change,
such a thing ought to appear, eventually.
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 22 2000 - 09:59:08 GMT