Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id HAA20366 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 17 Nov 2000 07:44:00 GMT Message-ID: <A4400389479FD3118C9400508B0FF2300410E4@DELTA.newhouse.akzonobel.nl> From: "Gatherer, D. (Derek)" <D.Gatherer@organon.nhe.akzonobel.nl> To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: religion/spirituality Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 08:39:40 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Lloyd:
Monotheism represented a great step forward in terms of replicating power.
Once one god was given the title "God" that god gained a tremendous
advantage over all others. Hence the Greek, Roman, Norse and Salishan gods
are now considered myths while Jehovah, nee Yaweh is now just "God".
Derek:
So why then did the polytheistic Christianity (Trinity and communion of
saints) do so much better than its strictly monotheistic root (Judaism)?
Why is Tibetan Buddhism now more prevalent than Zen or Theravada in the
West, despite being a relatively recent import compared to the other two?
Why did Victorian Protestantism (more monotheistic than most Christianity)
fail to make any headway against Hinduism in India despite the vigorous
backing of the British Raj for the best part of 200 years. On the contrary,
history suggests that polytheistic religions replicate best (I don't know
exactly why, but my guess is that they provide a greater range of options
and are thus more adaptable).
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 17 2000 - 07:45:29 GMT