RE: addendum to mysticism etc.

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Nov 14 2000 - 14:09:58 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Tests show a human side to chimps"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA08724 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:12:01 GMT
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745B06@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: addendum to mysticism etc.
    Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:09:58 -0000
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    > Richard:
    > <<<Memes spread for many reasons. We tend to pay attention to "crisis"
    > memes. We believe ideas that fit easily into our existing mindset. We
    > trust our authorities. We believe memes that get repeated several times,
    > especially from multiple sources. "Truth" is not a strong selector for
    > memes.>>>
    >
    >
    > Vincent:
    > <<That may be true for audiences, but what about the producers of media
    > content? Why are they so persistent in misrepresenting risk to the
    > public?>>
    >
            Tim:
            <Feedback loop.

    > The producer's job is to get and maintain market share (i.e.: audience).
    > Whatever tends to get more audience will tend to be selected for by the
    > producers. Whatever tends to push more buttons will tend to be selected
    > for by the audience. The result: a vicous circle of evolutionary
    > selection pressures that is only limited by the (ever changing) boundies
    > of that niche.>
    >
    >
            Quite possibly, although that's rarely what journalists would
    acknowledge, instead appealling to higher principles of informing society
    and window on the world etc. etc. I do get the feeling, stemming from
    memetics, that perhaps there is an underlying process that is quite
    simplistic in media production/consumption. I'm not sure that colleagues in
    my discipline would necessarily find a reductive approach that appealing,
    and more pragmatically, I'm not sure yet how to test this empirically- the
    process that is, not the outcome, particularly since context is so important
    in both production and consumption.

            Vincent

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 14 2000 - 14:13:26 GMT