Re: old paper, but unnoticed (on this list)

From: Robert G.(Bob) Grimes (grimes@fcol.com)
Date: Wed Nov 01 2000 - 21:31:55 GMT

  • Next message: Robert G.(Bob) Grimes: "Re: Neuronal competition"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA04459 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 1 Nov 2000 21:35:05 GMT
    Message-ID: <3A008BCB.4383C248@fcol.com>
    Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 16:31:55 -0500
    From: "Robert G.(Bob) Grimes" <grimes@fcol.com>
    Organization: Grimes & Grimes Consulting
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en]C-CCK-MCD compaq  (Win98; U)
    X-Accept-Language: en
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: old paper, but unnoticed (on this list)
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745AC4@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    The subject always reminds me of an incident while in the university
    studying clinical psychology. My close friend's father was a pharmacist
    and he worked afternoons in the pharmacy. I would visit often and many
    times sit at the soda fountain and sip a coke while discussing a myriad
    of things.

    One day I was in the midst of speaking about some adventures that I had
    in W.W.II on the island of Saipan. It involved finding bodies and
    equipment in the jungle and in the caves, being shot at occasionally by
    Japanese soldiers who had not surrendered but were still in the hills.
    Suddenly I noticed the young soda jerk, who was listening intently,
    becoming visibly ill. He was swelling over his face and his eyes were
    swelling so much they were closing on him so he almost couldn't see. My
    subject matter happened to be particularly gruesome because of the
    experiences and I silently concluded that my remarks had occasioned the
    hives reaction we were witnessing in such a dramatic fashion. I said
    nothing about this to the young teenage soda jerk but we took him back
    to the pharmacy and gave him a good dose of sodium glutamate, as I
    recall. His hives reaction commenced subsiding almost immediately and
    he looked almost as if a balloon had been punctured as his swelling
    visibly reduced in front of us.

    Later I spoke to my friend who had witnessed this and who had suggested
    the sodium glutamate (he later became a full time physician), telling
    him that I suspected the teenager's identification with the bloody
    terminology, etc., had induced a "fear reaction" that caused the hives
    reaction. Well, he agreed but, of course, we had no proof. So, as is
    my experimental wont, several days later I repeated the same type of war
    tales in front of the youngster and, again, we saw the same reaction.
    This is the true test of a psychosomatic reaction and must sadly
    confess that I repeated the experiment a couple of more times for other
    psychology students who didn't believe us when we discussed the case.
    Fortunately, the young man identified us as the folks who cured his
    reaction rather than the folks who caused it, and he was always glad to
    see us.

    You all are probably familiar with folks becoming nauseated and ill
    because of the subject matter of a conversation and their extreme
    identification reaction to the words as if they were the real thing.
    Unfortunately, when witnessing such things back at that time I must
    confess to also reproducing the same effect later on the same subjects.

    Such reactions are really not unusual if one thinks of circumstances
    which "turn men or women on sexually," usually the same type of
    identification reaction where they identify "words" with the real thing
    and have a sexual response. Most of us used such techniques during our
    "sporting" days as youths.

    So, having been exposed to many folks with different types of
    psychosomatic diseases I have also concluded that those same illnesses
    are probably frequently caused by similar responses. When one also adds
    in such hard to define things as pheromone affects, etc., it gets very
    difficult to deny such relationships, especially if one can reproduce
    them at will, cruel as that may sound.

    When a student and becoming convinced of such relationships I confess to
    doing experiments on what I considered susceptible subjects and had a
    very high rate of success. Needless to say, it also aided my romantic
    escapades at that time, too. Sometimes we even asked complete strangers
    questions about such relationships to "prove a point." I well remember
    overhearing a gentleman who, like me, was waiting to be seated in a
    restaurant, mention that he suffered from ulcerative colitis. I had
    some ideas about some of the causes of such symptoms and made on like I
    had met him previously, confirming my lie by asking him, "You do have a
    blonde wife, don't you?" He confirmed that he did and almost remembered
    my fake prior meeting, but he did confirm my statistical conclusion at
    the time, strange that it was, that a large preponderance of men with
    that illness "had blonde wives." Sadly again, my stats were startlingly
    accurate at the time with those I tested the conclusions on...
    Sometimes it is difficult to use such anecdotal conclusions for other
    than subjective background conclusions but I must confess that both
    myself and my friend had great results with it at the time. It served me
    very well during psychotherapy sessions where the confidence of the
    subject was of great value. Sometimes, I was amazed when they would ask
    me if "I could read minds!" But when a subject has that response they
    will accept your guidance and conclusions with great confidence and
    determination to follow your instructions.

    But, the important thing to remember is that we always dealing with
    physical facts, even if we do not know the scientific etiology of the
    disease or disorder, and the subject is truly "hurting" or in discomfort
    or has a real threat to their well-being, even if there is a dearth of
    pathological evidence to support the conclusions, regardless of the
    psychosomatic contribution...

    Those conclusions served me well over many years of working with people
    who were troubled or having difficulty.

    Cordially,

    Bob

    --
    Bob Grimes
    

    http://members.aol.com/bob5266/ http://pages.hotbot.com/edu/bobinjax/ http://www.phonefree.com/Scripts/cgiParse.exe?sID=28788 Jacksonville, Florida Bob5266@aol.com robert.grimes@excite.com bobinjax@hotbot.com

    Bobgrimes@zdnetmail.com

    Man is not in control, but the man who knows he is not in control is more in control...

    Quoth the Raven, "Nevermore....."

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 01 2000 - 21:36:37 GMT