Neuronal competition

From: John Wilkins (wilkins@wehi.EDU.AU)
Date: Tue Oct 31 2000 - 05:07:31 GMT

  • Next message: LJayson@aol.com: "Re: culture as niche construction?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id FAA10938 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 31 Oct 2000 05:11:49 GMT
    Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:07:31 +1100
    From: John Wilkins <wilkins@wehi.EDU.AU>
    Subject: Neuronal competition
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Message-ID: <MailDrop1.2d7k-PPC.1001031160731@mac463.wehi.edu.au>
    X-Authenticated: <wilkins@wehiz.wehi.edu.au>
    Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    While I'm on the kick of posting references, here's another that seemed
    relevant to memes - the way the brain develops has close analogies to
    the way populations evolve.

    Development of Nerve Connections under the Control of Neurotrophic
    Factors: Parallels with Consumer-Resource Systems in Population Biology
    Arjen van Ooyen 1 and David J. Willshaw
    Journal of Theoretical Biology (2000) 206: 195-210.

    Abstract
    The development of connections between neurons and their target cells
    involves competition between axons for target-derived neurotrophic
    factors. Although the notion of competition is commonly used in
    neurobiology, the process is not well understood, and only a few formal
    models exist. In population biology, in contrast, the concept of
    competition is well developed and has been studied by means of many
    formal models of consumer-resource systems. Here we show that a recently
    formulated model of axonal competition can be rewritten as a general
    consumer-resource system. This allows neurobiological phenomena to be
    interpreted in population biological terms and, conversely, results from
    population biology to be applied to neurobiology. Using findings from
    population biology, we study two extensions of our axonal competition
    model. In the first extension, the spatial dimension of the target is
    explicitly taken into account. We show that distance between axons on
    their target mitigates competition and permits the coexistence of axons.
    The model can account for the fact that, in many types of neurons, a
    positive correlation exists between the size of the dendritic tree and
    the number of innervating axons surviving into adulthood. In the second
    extension, axons are allowed to respond to more than one neurotrophic
    factor. We show that this permits competitive exclusion among axons of
    one type, while at the same time there is coexistence with axons of
    another type innervating the same target. The model offers an
    explanation for the innervation pattern found on cerebellar Purkinje
    cells, where climbing fibres compete with each other until only a single
    one remains, which coexists with parallel fibre input to the same
    Purkinje cell.

    --
    

    John Wilkins, Head, Graphic Production The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research Melbourne, Australia <mailto:wilkins@WEHI.EDU.AU> <http://www.users.bigpond.com/thewilkins/darwiniana.html> Homo homini aut deus aut lupus - Erasmus of Rotterdam

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 05:13:10 GMT