Re: Wimsatt on memes at the Uni Pittsburgh

From: William Benzon (bbenzon@mindspring.com)
Date: Mon Oct 23 2000 - 23:42:41 BST

  • Next message: Brent Silby: "Re: pub discussions"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA07877 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 23 Oct 2000 23:43:22 +0100
    User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513)
    Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:42:41 -0400
    Subject: Re: Wimsatt on memes at the Uni Pittsburgh
    From: William Benzon <bbenzon@mindspring.com>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Message-ID: <B61A2AE4.52D6%bbenzon@mindspring.com>
    In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0010210913050.185-100000@marlowe.umd.edu>
    Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    > From: "Lawrence H. de Bivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    > Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 10:20:45 -0400 (EDT)
    > To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    > Subject: RE: Wimsatt on memes at the Uni Pittsburgh
    >
    > Greetings,
    >
    >>> Like I said, it's not the "knowledge" I'm concerned about. It's
    >> the raw
    >>> data. Memetics seems to be mostly a coffee-klatcsh for theorists
    >> who wish
    >>> to remain unsullied by observations. Orthodox memetics is a genre
    >> of
    >>> science fiction.
    >
    > Keep in mind that this list is an academic one, and not broadly
    > representative of all the work that is being done on and with
    > memetics. The 'engineering' and ethnographical sides of memetics are not
    > addressed, for example. But that does not mean that these are not being
    > pursued elsewhere.
    >
    > IMO, the academic fora have bogged down a bit on definitional issues:
    > memes, culture, transmission are still being wrestled with definitionally.

    That's because people aren't intellectually serious. If you don't have a
    grasp of the data to be accounted for nor of the causal processes and
    mechanisms, then you just haggle over definitions. In my experience, serious
    thinkers don't waste time over definitions. Where the issues are well
    understood, thinkers may give definitions by way of indicating which (among
    several well-known) position they take. Where the issues are not well
    understood, more extensive investigations are undertaken.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 23 2000 - 23:46:12 BST