RE: Wimsatt on memes at the Uni Pittsburgh

From: Lawrence H. de Bivort (debivort@umd5.umd.edu)
Date: Sat Oct 21 2000 - 15:20:45 BST

  • Next message: Lawrence H. de Bivort: "Re: pub discussions"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA02994 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 21 Oct 2000 15:24:32 +0100
    X-Authentication-Warning: marlowe.umd.edu: debivort owned process doing -bs
    Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 10:20:45 -0400 (EDT)
    From: "Lawrence H. de Bivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    X-Sender: debivort@marlowe.umd.edu
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Wimsatt on memes at the Uni Pittsburgh
    In-Reply-To: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745AA6@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0010210913050.185-100000@marlowe.umd.edu>
    Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Greetings,

    > >Like I said, it's not the "knowledge" I'm concerned about. It's
    >the raw
    > >data. Memetics seems to be mostly a coffee-klatcsh for theorists
    >who wish
    > >to remain unsullied by observations. Orthodox memetics is a genre
    >of
    > >science fiction.

    Keep in mind that this list is an academic one, and not broadly
    representative of all the work that is being done on and with
    memetics. The 'engineering' and ethnographical sides of memetics are not
    addressed, for example. But that does not mean that these are not being
    pursued elsewhere.

    IMO, the academic fora have bogged down a bit on definitional issues:
    memes, culture, transmission are still being wrestled with definitionally.
    Those more interested in the engineering or field aspects of memes simply
    specify the definitions we want to abide by and move forward, the focus
    being more on communicating via clear definitions rather than the
    codification of definitions that everyone then abides by. This makes the
    dialogue a bit ponderous at times (everyone having to track each other's
    distinctions), but it allows rapid and fruitful investigation to go ahead.
    I think also that the notion of a 'community of scholars' is less
    essential to those interested in field or engineering research, and so if
    rapid understanding is not achieved with those more academically inclined,
    the field and engineering folks tend to move on, concentrating on their
    work.

    - Lawrence

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 21 2000 - 15:25:53 BST