RE: Social psychology

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Wed Oct 11 2000 - 10:33:45 BST

  • Next message: Chris Lofting: "RE: the conscious universe: subjectivity/objectivity of beliefs"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id KAA04086 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:36:12 +0100
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745A8E@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Social psychology
    Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 10:33:45 +0100
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Thanks Diana,

    That's interesting if library classifications put memetics in social
    psychology- that's probably why (as far as I know) it's not really been
    picked up by the sociology oriented disciplines like media studies (after
    all the books may be on different floors :-)).

    Incidentally, I came across the term through reading so called 'popular
    science' books like Dawkins etc., although I can't remember where I first
    read the term, but it was before picking up 'The Selfish Gene', which I only
    did later on when I discovered it was the origin of the term.

    Vincent

    > ----------
    > From: Diana Stevenson
    > Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 12:04 am
    > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Subject: Social psychology
    >
    > Vincent wrote:
    >
    > <I've stated many times before where I see a gap that fits mydiscipline's
    > capacity to contribute to memetics, and sometimes I think the focus on
    > individuals and the minds/brain processes underplays what I seeas the
    > central element of memetics, which is not simply about how an idea gets
    > from
    > one mind to another, but how social movements/trends originateand spread.
    > That means that as important as examining information/ideational transfer
    > between individuals is, the main point is how an idea spreads through
    > large
    > masses of people. I think there are social psychology elements here,
    > which
    > would involve things like group and organisational communication(for which
    > of course there's already lots of theories and research) as well as mass
    > communication (again subject to lots of theories and research that needs
    > to
    > be addressed).>
    >
    > I hope your approach takes off, Vincent. It's a point of interest that
    > the
    > world's major libraries have classified Blackmore, Lynch and Brodie's
    > books
    > on memetics as social psychology. Thus they are set in silicon and paper,
    >
    > and where browsing the shelves is a factor the classification will have
    > implications for the readership.
    >
    > Diana
    > ------
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > _________________________________________________________________________
    > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
    >
    > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
    > http://profiles.msn.com.
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 11 2000 - 10:37:29 BST