RE: the conscious universe

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Oct 05 2000 - 12:21:57 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "RE: mysticism"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA00697 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 5 Oct 2000 12:24:32 +0100
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745A72@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: the conscious universe
    Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 12:21:57 +0100 
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >Only in philosophy does a rank outsider think he's perfectly
    entitled
    >to stand up and spout off without having bothered to take one class
    or
    >read one book -- or one paper -- in the relevant area.

    Name me one author other than Velmans you've cited in all your invective
    that demonstrate's your superior knowledge in this area to mine.

    >I just wrote a couple of paragraphs, then deleted them. I'm tired
    of
    >this. If you're so keen to stick with your current views, why
    should I
    >bother?

    I could easily say the same of you.

    >My last word on this subject: IF you're really interested in
    consciousness
    >for its own sake, rather than just as a tool to bash what you view
    as
    >non-rationality, then get Max Velmans' book Understanding
    Consciousness.

    I'll look out for it. How about reading Dennet or Pinker on consciousness?
    You can do more than read books that you agree with you know. Somehow I
    doubt this'll be your last word, since you stated some time ago that you
    were going off to write your book, and then kept on posting anyway.

    >That paragraph is more seriously abusive than anything I've
    written.
    >I don't know why you felt it appropriate to react that way, and I'm
    not
    >going to speculate. Bye for now.

    I treated it that way because for the umpteenth time you reacted to a
    serious question with an abusive accusation of stupidity rather than
    actually dealing with the question.

    Vincent

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 05 2000 - 12:26:45 BST