RE: the conscious universe

From: Gatherer, D. (Derek) (D.Gatherer@organon.nhe.akzonobel.nl)
Date: Thu Oct 05 2000 - 13:46:56 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "RE: Purported mystical "knowledge""

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA01323 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 5 Oct 2000 13:51:28 +0100
    Message-ID: <A4400389479FD3118C9400508B0FF230041005@DELTA.newhouse.akzonobel.nl>
    From: "Gatherer, D. (Derek)" <D.Gatherer@organon.nhe.akzonobel.nl>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: the conscious universe
    Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 14:46:56 +0200 
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Vincent:
    How about reading Dennet or Pinker on consciousness?

    Derek:
    Ah, yes, the amount of time we've spent on this list disagreeing about what
    Dennett does or doesn't say, has been immense. Dennett seems to be the main
    cause for the revival of (popular) memetics in the 90s, since 'Consciousness
    Explained' in 1991. Pinker, of course, is quite anti-memetics, as in 'The
    Language Instinct' of 1994, and 'How the Mind Works'.

    And that reminds me, Sue Blackmore's new article is just out in Scientific
    American:

    Blackmore S.
    The power of memes.
    Sci Am. 2000 Oct;283(4):64-6, 68-71, 73

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 05 2000 - 13:53:36 BST