Re: acronymious

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Tue Oct 03 2000 - 19:55:58 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: acronymious"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA27036 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 3 Oct 2000 19:59:07 +0100
    Subject: Re: acronymious
    Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 14:55:58 -0400
    x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas est veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <20001003185601.AAA21301@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 10/03/00 14:16, Robin Faichney said this-

    >> It is said that Harvard runs on TLA's. And to a large extent, so does any
    >> bureaucracy require the jargon of its torpidity.
    >
    >I don't know about "the jargon of its torpidity", but I'd have said that
    >techies are just as guilty of jargonising as bureaucrats. And academics
    >could well be the worst!

    Ah, you see, but Harvard is a combination of all of those....

    As is our sister down the street....

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 03 2000 - 20:00:28 BST