Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA15006 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 13 Sep 2000 14:59:14 +0100 From: "Richard Brodie" <richard@brodietech.com> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: solipsistic view on memetics Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 06:56:48 -0700 Message-ID: <NBBBIIDKHCMGAIPMFFPJKEMHFFAA.richard@brodietech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745A05@inchna.stir.ac.uk> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Vincent wrote:
Personally I'm firmly in the western camp on this one, and the zen/bhuddist
"solutions" proposed by the likes of Brodie and Blackmore to the meme
"problem" I find very problematic.
So you dismiss any methodology that is not based on analysis?
Richard Brodie richard@brodietech.com
http://www.memecentral.com/rbrodie.htm
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 13 2000 - 15:00:20 BST