Re:Dolphin philosophy Fw: Animal Intelligence

From: Anne Hansen (tazzie@bolian.upnaway.com)
Date: Wed Aug 16 2000 - 12:28:02 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Changing threads/ American Nationalism !?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA00738 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 16 Aug 2000 12:33:53 +0100
    Message-ID: <006001c00775$13cacdc0$622484d8@default>
    From: "Anne Hansen" <tazzie@bolian.upnaway.com>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re:Dolphin philosophy Fw: Animal Intelligence
    Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 19:28:02 +0800
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Off track slightly to communication but I thought this may be of interest..
    Does any one know of other such experiments

            Anne

    To: <SCIENCE-MATTERS@YOUR.abc.net.au>
    Sent: Monday, 14 August 2000 11:38
    Subject: Animal Intelligence

    > There seems to be a 'work to rule' policy on the part of the listserv on
    > weekends. I sent the following message on Sunday but it was delivered to a
    > black hole in cyberspace, I suspect.
    >
    >
    > In the Weekend Australian of 5/6 Aug 00 there is a three-page article
    about
    > intelligence in animals. The article also discusses whether or not 'human
    > rights' should be extended to animals, and if so, to which animals.
    >
    > The most interesting part (to me) of the article is the opening few paras.
    > An experiment was done to determine if dolphins were capable of realising
    > that a person had a belief that they knew to be false. The experiment was
    > conducted as follows:
    >
    > Two boxes were placed in a tank. A fish would be in one, the other would
    be
    > empty. The handler would tap on one box--the one that had a fish in it. If
    > the dolphin touched that box with his/her nose, the fish would be given to
    > the dolphin. But if the dolphin touched the wrong box--no fish. After a
    > while the dolphins learned that the box that their handler tapped was the
    > one containing the fish, so they would touch this one.
    >
    > When they were familiar with this, the handler would pretend to be
    > distracted. While the handler was facing the other way, a person would
    > exchange the boxes. The handler would then turn back and tap on a box. The
    > dolphins then had to choose between the 'correct box' (assuming that the
    > handler did not realise the exchange had taken place) and the box that he
    > tapped. Although the scientific paper to be submitted to a peer-reviewed
    > journal has not been through the refereeing process, according to this
    > article the statistics indicated a significant number of correct answers
    > (ie, that the dolphins were aware of the 'false belief' of the handler,
    and
    > so touched the box he had not tapped).
    >
    > The article states that 'Such tests have been recognised as an indicator
    of
    > advanced cognitive abilities in humans since the early 1980s'. Generally,
    > children get tests similar to this wrong until they are about 4-6 years of
    > age. Understanding such false beliefs is thought to depend on making an
    > inference about a mental state in someone else, thereby (perhaps)
    indicating
    > an awareness of 'self' and 'others'. One scientist is quoted as saying:
    > ''This is a test (that) if replicated, indicates that we are not the only
    > sentient beings on earth.'
    >
    > Even allowing for the journalistic hyperbole, I believe that this is a
    > fascinating and potentially very important finding.
    >
    > Further into the article is neurological/anatomical evidence that the
    great
    > apes may have an awareness of self. Cells in the frontal lobe of people
    that
    > serve no known function other than as a centre of self-awareness have now
    > been isolated from the frontal lobes of chimpanzees, gorillas and
    > orang-outangs.
    > Chris Forbes-Ewan

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 16 2000 - 12:34:49 BST