Re: Gender bias for memes

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Tue Jul 25 2000 - 20:03:01 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Gender Bias For Memes"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA04979 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 25 Jul 2000 19:35:51 +0100
    Message-ID: <000b01bff66a$f59aea80$4a02bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <200007240029.UAA19944@mail4.lig.bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: Gender bias for memes
    Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 21:03:01 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Joe E. Dees <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 2:34 AM
    Subject: Re: Gender bias for memes

    > He has discussed in too many words, while saying little if anything,
    > for quite some time now. The cascading concatenation of fuzz
    > inundating this list has caused the more serious among us to say
    > little, and none of them address Chris. They recognize a memetic
    > infection when they see it. Only the blissfully oblivious newbies are
    > embracing his word salad.

    Come Joe, you can do better than that !! The more serious !? What do you
    think I am, it is not that I adress myself to Chris that I am a kind of
    fool.
    Chris representation was something I did not know, that is the idea re left/
    right etc is a main interest of mine, Chris took it trough another angle...
    So what if I do believe him or not !? Memetic infection !? So what, what
    are
    you afraid of, that your little pretty mind would be infected by some memes
    you don 't like !? So what !? Stay out of the conversation like you did.
    The moment you intered the discussion between Chris and me, what reason
    did you have, you and the ' serious ones ' !?
    To make an end at the joke !? Well you did it !! Thank you very much !
    Is that now memetics !? I did say it before, if you don 't believe somebody
    's
    word salad, challenge him, that is the purpose of this list, not to employ
    your
    own fine ideas...
    And so what that I am newbie, what 's got that to do with it !!
    And keeping a ' cordon sanitaire ' ,treaten a fellow member as an outcast,
    ' none of then adressed to him... ' !?
    So what, start up another tread, it is easy...
    So, I assume that all members has seen it coming then !! Fine, another
    lesson learned, a hard one, but I let this rest now, it is over.
    I 'll go back to the subject which I originally started, with your help or
    not,
    I will continue to write to Chris.
    If that should however undermine mine credibility, well so be it !
    I have mine interest, you got yours.

    > Is racial memetic bias next?

    Why not, memetics is everyone 's game !!

    > > Regards,
    > >
    > > Kenneth
    > >
    > > (I am, because we are) disappointed
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 25 2000 - 19:36:46 BST