Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA00953 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 24 Jul 2000 15:19:15 +0100 Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745950@inchna.stir.ac.uk> From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk> To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: Gender bias for memes Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 15:16:50 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
	>Only the blissfully oblivious newbies are 
>embracing his word salad. 
And there was me thinking you were on my side Joe! :-)
Vincent
> ----------
> From: 	Joe E. Dees
> Reply To: 	memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> Sent: 	Monday, July 24, 2000 1:34 am
> To: 	memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> Subject: 	Re: Gender bias for memes
> 
> From:           	"Kenneth Van Oost"
> <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
> To:             	"memetics" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
> Subject:        	Gender bias for memes
> Date sent:      	Sun, 23 Jul 2000 17:36:18 +0200
> Send reply to:  	memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> 
> > Come on boys, let 's stick together,
> > 
> >             Joe
> Chris
> > 
> >     male (order)                                            female
> (change)
> >     consensus,                                             opportunistic
> > 
> > (any perceived weakness in the other         (likes the feedback)
> > party is jumped-upon, like the claim
> > Joe makes that Chris violates his own
> > propounded rules)
> > 
> His gender, combined with his verbosity and imprecision, does 
> indeed provide a counterexample to his gender-bigoted contentions.
> >
> >     action,                                                    language,
> >
> All we have are words here: it's ALL language.
> > 
> > ( 'attacks ' with words_reacts without         (is likely to explain
> things,
> > thought of consequence )                          is more context aware,
> >                                                               ' knows '
> his stuff )
> >
> I question his knowledge of (as opposed to belief in) his "stuff" as 
> you call it.  And what consequence?  Either he can back up his 
> assertions, or he can't; either way, something useful is learned. 
> >     sameness,
> > 
> > " trying to make logical sense out of your
> > (Chris) screeds... " is IMHO (Kenneth) a
> > statement likely close to what is by the
> > ' general ' understood for logic. The defi-
> > nition of the term which Joe apllies is
> > violated by Chris, so joe strikes back.
> > 
> > Joe, you have to admit,  ' accusing ' Chris that his politeness dropped
> like a
> > rock and challenging his concepten in that way (without any attempt to
> dis-
> > cuss the matter) is IMHO_ even fundamentalistic. And expecting as much,
> > betrays a prejudice.
> >
> He has discussed in too many words, while saying little if anything, 
> for quite some time now.  The cascading concatenation of fuzz 
> inundating this list has caused the more serious among us to say 
> little, and none of them address Chris.  They recognize a memetic 
> infection when they see it.  Only the blissfully oblivious newbies are 
> embracing his word salad. 
> >
> > But anyone on this list who has gotten the idea re left/right; sameness/
> diffe-
> > rence must be excited_you and Chris are proovin '  ' live ' that there
> is a gen-
> > der bias for memes.
> > Look at your posts, they stand full of male/ female formulas, responses,
> ex-
> > pressions...
> >
> But we are both (purportedly) male, which DISproves such 
> contentions.  Try smelling coffee; sometimes it can help.
> > 
> > We better argue what is the useful truth of such arguments...in the
> context
> > of the subject please...
> > 
> Is racial memetic bias next?
> >
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Kenneth
> > 
> > (I am, because we are) disappointed
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> ===============================================================
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
> 
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 24 2000 - 15:20:07 BST