RE: Gender bias for memes

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Jul 24 2000 - 15:16:50 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Gender Bias For Memes"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA00953 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 24 Jul 2000 15:19:15 +0100
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745950@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Gender bias for memes
    Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 15:16:50 +0100
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >Only the blissfully oblivious newbies are
    >embracing his word salad.

    And there was me thinking you were on my side Joe! :-)

    Vincent

    > ----------
    > From: Joe E. Dees
    > Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 1:34 am
    > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Subject: Re: Gender bias for memes
    >
    > From: "Kenneth Van Oost"
    > <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    > To: "memetics" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    > Subject: Gender bias for memes
    > Date sent: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 17:36:18 +0200
    > Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >
    > > Come on boys, let 's stick together,
    > >
    > > Joe
    > Chris
    > >
    > > male (order) female
    > (change)
    > > consensus, opportunistic
    > >
    > > (any perceived weakness in the other (likes the feedback)
    > > party is jumped-upon, like the claim
    > > Joe makes that Chris violates his own
    > > propounded rules)
    > >
    > His gender, combined with his verbosity and imprecision, does
    > indeed provide a counterexample to his gender-bigoted contentions.
    > >
    > > action, language,
    > >
    > All we have are words here: it's ALL language.
    > >
    > > ( 'attacks ' with words_reacts without (is likely to explain
    > things,
    > > thought of consequence ) is more context aware,
    > > ' knows '
    > his stuff )
    > >
    > I question his knowledge of (as opposed to belief in) his "stuff" as
    > you call it. And what consequence? Either he can back up his
    > assertions, or he can't; either way, something useful is learned.
    > > sameness,
    > >
    > > " trying to make logical sense out of your
    > > (Chris) screeds... " is IMHO (Kenneth) a
    > > statement likely close to what is by the
    > > ' general ' understood for logic. The defi-
    > > nition of the term which Joe apllies is
    > > violated by Chris, so joe strikes back.
    > >
    > > Joe, you have to admit, ' accusing ' Chris that his politeness dropped
    > like a
    > > rock and challenging his concepten in that way (without any attempt to
    > dis-
    > > cuss the matter) is IMHO_ even fundamentalistic. And expecting as much,
    > > betrays a prejudice.
    > >
    > He has discussed in too many words, while saying little if anything,
    > for quite some time now. The cascading concatenation of fuzz
    > inundating this list has caused the more serious among us to say
    > little, and none of them address Chris. They recognize a memetic
    > infection when they see it. Only the blissfully oblivious newbies are
    > embracing his word salad.
    > >
    > > But anyone on this list who has gotten the idea re left/right; sameness/
    > diffe-
    > > rence must be excited_you and Chris are proovin ' ' live ' that there
    > is a gen-
    > > der bias for memes.
    > > Look at your posts, they stand full of male/ female formulas, responses,
    > ex-
    > > pressions...
    > >
    > But we are both (purportedly) male, which DISproves such
    > contentions. Try smelling coffee; sometimes it can help.
    > >
    > > We better argue what is the useful truth of such arguments...in the
    > context
    > > of the subject please...
    > >
    > Is racial memetic bias next?
    > >
    > > Regards,
    > >
    > > Kenneth
    > >
    > > (I am, because we are) disappointed
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 24 2000 - 15:20:07 BST