Re: point of memetic saturation

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Thu Jul 20 2000 - 20:21:26 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Memes and sexuality" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA28295 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 20 Jul 2000 20:20:03 +0100
Message-ID: <002301bff283$43a09c20$6b0bbed4@default>
From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
References: <LPBBICPHCJJBPJGHGMCICEGFCHAA.ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
Subject: Re: point of memetic saturation
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 21:21:26 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    << Chris, you asked me this, I thought about it, here are my responses. >>
    >
    > Your emphasis suggests you seek DIFFERENT expressions, DIFFERENT
    sensations
    > which implies you are more ASPECTS oriented.
    >
    > To resolve these DIFFERENCES answer two questions (*think about them
    first*)
    >
    > (1)Do you prefer facts to values; would you easily surrender a value if
    > presented with a fact? (ans: FACT or VALUE)

    VALUE !!

    > (2)Do you prefer 'what WAS/IS/WILL BE' or 'what COULD HAVE BEEN/is
    NOT/COULD
    > BE'? (ans: WILL or COULD)

    WAS/ IS/ WILL BE !!

    Regards,

    Kenneth

    (I am, because we are)

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 20 2000 - 20:24:03 BST