From: Chris Taylor (christ@ebi.ac.uk)
Date: Mon 25 Apr 2005 - 00:45:47 GMT
Sorry to be a pedant, but being of selective value (which I'd have to 
dispute anyway -- cf. the 'ICU' hypothesis -- except in the very young 
and/or cryptic for whom it is about the only option) says nothing about 
the generative mechanism for the behaviour...
Incidentally, and tangentially really; in the super-cryptic young (esp. 
mammals, birds), do they tend to also be scent-free?
Just conjecturing wildly anyway...  :)
Cheers, Chris.
Bill Spight wrote:
> Dear Chris,
> 
>> picture the rabbit in headlights; does not compute = no relevant
>> experience = no resonance with existing stuff and linked behaviours =
>> no behaviour. An engineered mind would have a fight or flight default
>> surely?
> 
> 
> 
> Actually, freezing has survival value in the wild. Not only does it make 
> it at least somewhat more difficult to be seen, but in many predators 
> flight triggers the chase.
> 
> There was a remarkable documentary recently about a young lioness who 
> "adopted" an antelope fawn. Presumably part of the reason was that the 
> fawn did not try to run away. It lived for some time, before being eaten 
> by another lion.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Bill
> 
> ===============================================================
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
> 
> 
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon 25 Apr 2005 - 01:02:00 GMT