Re: Cons and Facades/memetic engineering

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Sat Jul 08 2000 - 20:10:41 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: point of memetic saturation"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA25531 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 8 Jul 2000 19:44:26 +0100
    Message-ID: <000701bfe910$4f2f1f20$4e03bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745903@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re: Cons and Facades/memetic engineering
    Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 21:10:41 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 12:39 PM
    Subject: RE: Cons and Facades/memetic engineering

    > Thanks for this.
    >
    > I think you're very right. What's interesting then is whether there is a
    > particular point in time at which a community recognises these animal
    > behaviours as inappropriate for that particular kind of community.

    << Is there a point !? I think there is, but what I am gonna say is of
    course
    pure speculative.
    The main issue for man and memes was in that time, survival, pure and
    simple.
    So memes (and genes) directed towards survival scaled down bahaviour-
    patterns like incest/ sodomie and cannibalism...not because they were wrong,
    but they jeapardized the survival of man/ species and meme.
    How !? Due to the fact, and that is of course the flaw in this statement,
    that
    early humans had to understand, and probably they did understand, the
    consequences of those behaviourpatterns.
    One of the major results of incest are ' bad ' children, the consequences
    of
    sodomie were ' some kind of children ' (if the female gets pregnant in the
    first place), the consequences of cannibalism we all know.
    So, due to the fact that early humans had the ' proove ' at first hand that
    those patterns were ' bad ', it is easy to presume that they became inappro-
    priate for those kind of communities. >>

    If you like, is there a kind of social equivalent of the Adam and Eve story?

    << In Girards view, the beginning of culture starts with the murder of Kaïn.
    See my post of Sunday 14 May about that. But a social equivalent of the
    Adam and Eve story !? The story of Abel and Kaïn can support in some
    way that notion, but a biblical stance for that kind of stuff is not my cop
    of
    tea. I have to think about that, though ! >>

     < Snip >

    > Just thinking about it, the notion of taboo is almost a conscious
    > meme-antidote. If you don't want people to imitate certain behaviours,
    then
    > one way to minimize the liklihood of this happening is by restricting the
    > extent to which people communicate (or represent through art etc.) that
    > behaviour.

    << Don 't you think that comes close to what Wade T. Smith wrote, that
    the whole issue is a ' lie ', just for the sake of certain ' good or bad '
    beha-
    viours !? >>
    > Then, at the other end of the spectrum, you get the equivalent
    > I suppose of a memetic bacteriophage, in things like Meagan's Law. Flood
    > the communication environment with knowledge about who conducts the
    unwanted
    > behaviours to the point where they are unable to do it anymore.

    << You can state the same argument here, a ' lie ' !?
    In my point of view, ' having no reaction left,( unable to do it anymore) is
    still a reaction ' and a very dangerous one. I think I have already put it
    forward that we with the memetic concept in hand can ' proove ' that
    certain unwanted behaviours and conducts are due to the fact of neurological
    patterns/ memes and ideas and those people having those behaviourpatterns
    can 't help if they behave the way they do.
    But that is of course another debate.>>

    Regards,

    Kenneth

    (I am, because we are)

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 08 2000 - 19:45:10 BST