RE: Cons and Facades - more on truth

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Jun 29 2000 - 11:32:11 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Cons and Facades/memetic engineering"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id LAA02615 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:34:23 +0100
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D31017458E8@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Cons and Facades - more on truth
    Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:32:11 +0100
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Thanks, I see what you're saying here. I particularly like the lotto
    example.

    Vincent

    > ----------
    > From: Chris Lofting
    > Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 12:13 am
    > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Subject: RE: Cons and Facades - more on truth
    >
    >
    >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    > > Of Vincent Campbell
    > > Sent: Thursday, 22 June 2000 12:56
    > > To: 'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'
    > > Subject: RE: Cons and Facades - more on truth
    > >
    > >
    > > Your example presumably was designed to show the correctness of your
    > > waypoint argument. What I'm doing here is questioning the validity of
    > an
    > > example where waypoints are an explicit, conscious part of the knowledge
    > > being learned by the taxi drivers.
    > >
    >
    > fair enough.
    >
    > > Whay about a Buddhist monk's learning? Is that waypoint-oriented?
    > >
    >
    > There is hierarchic structure such that each level is a waypoint and you
    > measure your degree of 'progress' by linking to a current 'state'.
    > Meditations act to refine aspect of a particular state that reflects
    > waypoint mapping but at a time scale of years rather than minutes/hours.
    >
    > I think Zen attempts to break-free of the links by 'returning' to zero and
    > with Taoism favours sticking to the moment such that each moment is 'new',
    > you do not link.
    >
    > This takes you into the removal of feedback processes in the form of
    > memory/history that act to control, at best you work with guidance.
    >
    > Thus taoism/zen gets more 'one' oriented (or zero :-)) whereas buddhism is
    > more into 'the many' with an emphasis on all connected to everything else
    > -
    > which is a concept that emerges from secondary thinking, harmonics
    > analysis.
    >
    > The waypoint mapping comes into things when we introduce feedback
    > processes;
    > it is like the human approach to lotto where the mathematician's
    > perspective
    > is 'taoist' in that each draw is 'new' and so there is no linkage, whereas
    > the population at large, being attuned to feedback processes naturally,
    > link
    > future draws with current/past draws and 'see' patterns. These patterns
    > emerge as properties of the METHOD of linkage.
    >
    > For example, if I take into consideration two previous draw contexts and
    > apply them to determining the next draw, if you map that out you will see
    > a
    > fibonacci pattern emerge. As you add more and more draws as contexts to
    > apply to the next draw so you will see varying patterns emerge getting
    > closer and closer to a pattern reflecting binary sequences.
    >
    > The METHOD of analysis does this and so these patterns come from the
    > METHOD
    > and do not necessarily reflect 'out there' (as in patterns in lotto etc).
    >
    > The linking of past draws to in some way IDENTIFY the next draw is a form
    > of
    > waypoint mapping, there is a territorial linkage at work where it is
    > assumed
    > that past points 'link' to next and so we should be able to identify the
    > next, we should be able to CORRECTLY identify the next set of numbers.
    >
    > This may be 'crap' from a mathematical viewpoint but our mental methods
    > allow us to come up with such concepts and they FEEL 'right' regardless of
    > 'objective' truth since the method is hard-coded, it is instinctive and is
    > naturally applied to any process; as we interact with the context, both
    > local and non-local, we apply all tools we have to generate 'meaning' and
    > if
    > the tools seem to 'work' then we habituate even though the meaning may be
    > 'false' from an external point of view. This method of analysis reflects
    > secondary methods where we introduce probabilities into our attempts to
    > identify.
    >
    > best,
    >
    > Chris.
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 29 2000 - 11:35:07 BST