Re: Putting the method to the madness

From: Chris Klopper (syntagm@icon.co.za)
Date: Tue Jun 20 2000 - 13:10:52 BST

  • Next message: Lawrence H. de Bivort: "Re: Putting the method to the madness"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA07352 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 20 Jun 2000 13:27:28 +0100
    Message-ID: <004101bfdab2$b3bb8cb0$6c5afea9@Chris2>
    From: "Chris Klopper" <syntagm@icon.co.za>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <20000620044954.AAA4594@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.162]>
    Subject: Re: Putting the method to the madness
    Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 14:10:52 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    I have always suspected that in terms of our ability to
    <understand><perceive>
    <comprehend><grasp>, there is something analogous to our ability to hear.
    The ability of the normal human ear spans a finite spectrum of the total
    sound spectrum.

    It is my belief that certain things are <too small><too close><too
    incremental> to grasp while
    others are far too large.

    I lack good examples of the former (perhaps for obvious reasons), but my
    interest in political
    science have brought me to the point of believing that the crimes of
    governments are
    potential candidates of the latter. I am not referring to apartheid (always
    painfully visible)
    or Bosnia, I am talking orders of magnitude bigger than that.

    Chris Klopper

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 6:49 AM
    Subject: Putting the method to the madness

    > Aaron Lynch made this comment not too long ago --
    >
    > >memetics may,
    > >to some extent, face circumstances resembling those of astronomy.
    Astronomy
    > >deals with large-scale phenomena for which experimental manipulations are
    > >usually difficult.
    >
    > Hmmm.
    >
    > Much of the 'truths' and 'findings' of astronomy, while certainly, and
    > heavily, mathematical, are also highly technological and 'other-spectral'
    > - meaning, using non-human perceptual tools to gather data.
    >
    > And I would concur- memetics will flounder hopelessly until the spectrum
    > of data is expanded and the tools to perceive the infra- and the ultra-
    > of culture are found.
    >
    > - Wade
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 20 2000 - 13:28:21 BST