Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id FAA03376 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 20 Jun 2000 05:52:10 +0100 Subject: Putting the method to the madness Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 00:49:53 -0400 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20000620044954.AAA4594@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.162]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Aaron Lynch made this comment not too long ago --
>memetics may,
>to some extent, face circumstances resembling those of astronomy. Astronomy
>deals with large-scale phenomena for which experimental manipulations are
>usually difficult.
Hmmm.
Much of the 'truths' and 'findings' of astronomy, while certainly, and
heavily, mathematical, are also highly technological and 'other-spectral'
- meaning, using non-human perceptual tools to gather data.
And I would concur- memetics will flounder hopelessly until the spectrum
of data is expanded and the tools to perceive the infra- and the ultra-
of culture are found.
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 20 2000 - 05:52:54 BST