RE: Cons and Facades

From: Lawrence H. de Bivort (debivort@umd5.umd.edu)
Date: Wed Jun 14 2000 - 16:49:33 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "RE: Cons and Facades"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA28215 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 14 Jun 2000 16:51:22 +0100
    X-Authentication-Warning: frost.umd.edu: debivort owned process doing -bs
    Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 11:49:33 -0400 (EDT)
    From: "Lawrence H. de Bivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    X-Sender: debivort@frost.umd.edu
    To: memetics list <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Cons and Facades
    In-Reply-To: <20000614154024.AAA6313@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
    Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0006141148350.2283-100000@frost.umd.edu>
    Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Wade T.Smith wrote:

    >On 06/14/00 10:37, Lawrence H. de Bivort said this-
    >
    >>4. Sometimes we anticipate or fear the information's possible misuse.
    >>For me, 'memetic engineering' falls into this last category. (I know not
    >>everyone shares this view.)
    >
    >In science, there is no truth unless it is shared. Period. There is no
    >grey there. Moralizing is always false in science- then it is politics.
    >You're being political, not misunderstood.

    Agreed, Wade. Good luck with your science.

    - Lawrence

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 14 2000 - 16:52:04 BST