RE: Cons and Facades

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Wed Jun 14 2000 - 16:39:56 BST

  • Next message: Lawrence H. de Bivort: "RE: Cons and Facades" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA28133 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 14 Jun 2000 16:42:47 +0100
Subject: RE: Cons and Facades
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 11:39:56 -0400
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas est veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <20000614154024.AAA6313@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    On 06/14/00 10:37, Lawrence H. de Bivort said this-

    >4. Sometimes we anticipate or fear the information's possible misuse.
    >For me, 'memetic engineering' falls into this last category. (I know not
    >everyone shares this view.)

    In science, there is no truth unless it is shared. Period. There is no
    grey there. Moralizing is always false in science- then it is politics.
    You're being political, not misunderstood.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 14 2000 - 16:43:28 BST