RE: back to basics

From: Keith Henson (hkhenson@rogers.com)
Date: Thu 29 May 2003 - 00:14:21 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "RE: back to basics"

    At 04:44 PM 28/05/03 -0700, you wrote:
    >Lawry wrote:
    >
    ><<Hi Richard, yes, I think it must have been over a year ago, several
    >members
    >of the list specified that memetic engineering was not possible.>>
    >
    >Perhaps we ought to split this into two lists, one for people interested in
    >memetics and one for people who wish to argue that memetics is stupid and
    >useless.

    Or perhaps move back to usenet. There was some decent discussion on alt.memetics. Higher signal to noise ratio than you see here.

    Keith Henson

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 29 May 2003 - 00:19:00 GMT