RE: back to basics

From: Richard Brodie (richard@brodietech.com)
Date: Wed 28 May 2003 - 23:44:58 GMT

Next message: Richard Brodie: "RE: Polichak on memetics"

Previous message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: alterations"
In reply to: Lawrence DeBivort: "RE: back to basics"
Next in thread: Keith Henson: "RE: back to basics"
Reply: Keith Henson: "RE: back to basics"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Lawry wrote:

<<Hi Richard, yes, I think it must have been over a year ago, several members of the list specified that memetic engineering was not possible.>>

Perhaps we ought to split this into two lists, one for people interested in memetics and one for people who wish to argue that memetics is stupid and useless.

Richard Brodie www.memecentral.com

=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

Next message: Richard Brodie: "RE: Polichak on memetics"
Previous message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: alterations"
In reply to: Lawrence DeBivort: "RE: back to basics"
Next in thread: Keith Henson: "RE: back to basics"
Reply: Keith Henson: "RE: back to basics"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed 28 May 2003 - 23:49:59 GMT