RE: memetics-digest V1 #1369

From: Richard Brodie (richard@brodietech.com)
Date: Tue 27 May 2003 - 21:26:52 GMT

Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: (Reply to Benzon)"

Previous message: Richard Brodie: "RE: moving along"
In reply to: Wade T. Smith: "Re: memetics-digest V1 #1369"
Next in thread: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: memetics-digest V1 #1369"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Wade wrote:

<<Granting that something is memetic in nature does not demand that there then need be a meme in a mind, and it does not demand that something is
'transmitted by one mind and received by another' - whatever that means.>>

Of course it does. That's the definition of memetics.

Richard Brodie www.memecentral.com

=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: (Reply to Benzon)"
Previous message: Richard Brodie: "RE: moving along"
In reply to: Wade T. Smith: "Re: memetics-digest V1 #1369"
Next in thread: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: memetics-digest V1 #1369"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue 27 May 2003 - 21:32:00 GMT