Re: memetics-digest V1 #1369

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Tue 27 May 2003 - 20:47:20 GMT

  • Next message: Ray Recchia: "Re: memetics-digest V1 #1369"

    >
    > On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 03:47 PM, Joe wrote:
    >
    > > If it is granted that it is externally taught and learned (between),
    > > then it is communicated between minds, that is, transmitted by one
    > > mind and received by another, which means it has
    > > proliferated/replicated, and thus is memetic in nature, by
    > > definition.
    >
    > Granting that something is memetic in nature does not demand that
    > there then need be a meme in a mind, and it does not demand that
    > something is 'transmitted by one mind and received by another' -
    > whatever that means.
    >
    Actually, it does. Minds are the sources and the destinations of memes; without that cognitive environment, memes could not exist, and thus the qurstion of performing the absent would never arise. And transmission/reception between minds is achieved by encoding meaning in a commonly understood symbol system transmissable via action and receivable via perception.
    >
    > - Wade
    >
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue 27 May 2003 - 20:52:35 GMT