Re: transmission

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Mon 26 May 2003 - 20:07:56 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T. Smith: "Re: misunderstanding"

    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    > > I do not believe that we are blindly selected by our environments,
    > > without also selecting for our future environments in a
    > > co-evolutionary dance. Thus, I am not the memetic equivalent of a
    > > Watsonian or Skinnerian behaviorist, but consider myself to be a
    > > cognitive memetician.
    >
    > And yes, that is your prerogative and we should admire the fact you
    > being consistent in your argumentation about the matter, but one thing
    > simply remains_ the fact that we select our future environments in a
    > co- evolutionay way can be just yet another cultural demand in order
    > to propagate ideas, thoughts and memories.
    >
    > The fact that we think that we select, and do have the will and the
    > aility to do so has an enormous impact on our species and upon the
    > environment we all live in. The alledged selection of who we want to
    > be, what kind of religion we wish to believe in, even gender is
    > submitted to change these days has consequences beyond our
    > understanding. The selection of we being genetic/ memetic unique, of
    > we being individuals has created possibilites beyond our imagination.
    >
    > Groupbounding was an important aspect of we becoming human
    > in the first place. Individuality these days is the norm.
    > Did we select it or were there certain aspects of/ within the
    > environment that induced those upon us !? If it is neither, and as you
    > claim it is done within the context of co- evolution, who hold the
    > leach !? Still not sure who is Bigfoot and who is the Yeti....
    >
    The environment impacts individuals and individuals impact the environment. They are co-evolutionary, each feeding into the other; to ascribe causal priority to either is to assume a stance that irretrieveably engages one in an unverifiable chicken-and-egg argument.
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > Kenneth
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon 26 May 2003 - 20:13:16 GMT